Tag Archives: must read

The Sign of Four: 12. The Strange Story of Jonathan Small

Doyle could have called this “the chapter where the backstory no one except the characters care about is related” and been much more accurate, but that’s just my opinion.

I really didn’t care about Small, and his story just made me hate him. The other characters reacted the same way, including the now listless Holmes, and everything else, well, it’s all a line of greed leading to grief and so on. Small’s pitched the jewels into the river because he’s a hypocrite, and gods. Watson is happy about this, of course, but at least doesn’t mention it again.

A note: the story is at least about a man who starts out prejudiced against dark people (for admittedly good reason, due to the racism against white people where he spent a major part of his life) and then treats them as any other person. That at least is admirable, but killing a merchant in cold blood, and everything else is not.

Instead of Small’s backstory, the most interesting part of this chapter is… well… the sad scene at the end where Holmes apparently feels utterly rejected by Watson’s decision to marry Morstan and, worse yet, considers this to perhaps be “the last investigation in which I shall have the chance of studying your methods.” Why, Watson? Holmes gives “a most dismal groan” and says, “I feared as much.” He’s losing his only friend, someone who he has grown to depend on as a partner in his cases, and indeed the only partner who actually respects him in the midst of sneering policemen taking all the credit.

And it all ends on some of the saddest notes in the canon—perhaps the saddest:

“The division seems rather unfair,” I remarked. “You have done all the work in thsi business. I get a wife out of it, Jones gets the credit, pray what remains for you?”

“For me,” said Sherlock Holmes, “there still remains the cocaine-bottle.” And he stretched his long white hand up for it.

No matter what you feel about Holmes’ and/or Watson’s orientation, they have a friendship and a kind of codependency on Holmes’ end at the very least. To see them breaking up like this is almost tear-worthy. I was wrong about Holmes teasing Watson about The Sign of Four post-publication. There can be nothing but bitterness here.

Here’s an implication to really make you cry: while embarking on a case during Watson’s absence from his life, while which Watson admits he had barely contacted Holmes at all, Holmes must have turned to say, “Watson, please remain,” only to remember that Watson is no longer there.

How about another one: Holmes has gotten used to having somebody to talk to about all kinds of things, even seems to have picked up study of literature and other sciences and things that formerly he would have scoffed at as not being worth his attention as a crime detective, only to have that somebody leave and never send letters or telegrams or drop in or anything for a long time. How lonely the nights must have suddenly been, and even playing the violin would remind him that there’s nobody to play the occasional airs for.

Or how about a third one: Holmes no longer has anybody to temper his need for cocaine while off a case. And cocaine really does affect the mind and body. He’s probably taking quite a lot of it, all told. With the new emptiness of his life, which he had only just gotten used to no longer having, how much more would he want to take cocaine to get away from it all?

*sadface forever*

This chapter is thus a mix of “we read it so you don’t have to” and “must read”.

Anyways. *sniff*

Next time: BBC Radio 4′s adaptation of The Sign of Four, followed by the Granada series’ mixed adaptation.

The Sign of Four: 9. A Break in the Chain

Another great chapter that establishes more of the near-constant characteristics of Holmes, in particular his extreme restlessness when not allowed, for one reason or another, to keep chasing down the scent of his case. He’s actively unhappy, and could even be considered depressed and manic at the same time. Watson wants adventure, to a certain relatively healthy extent; Holmes desires resolution to an unhealthy extent; he can’t sleep, he barely eats, he paces about, and obssessed over the problem. In fact, it’s only when he removes his mind temporarily from the problem that he progresses, but unhealthy chemical experiments are still unhealthy. Fortunately he isn’t (yet?) taking cocaine while he’s on a case.

We’re also introduced to Holmes’ sexism, which will remain unchallenged for some while (beyond the end of this book, even though he recognizes Morstan’s abilities):

“I would not tell them too much,” said Holmes. “Women are never to be entirely trusted—not the best of them.”

I did not pause to argue over this atrocious statement.

It is atrocious indeed, an unjust generalization and stereotyping of women. You’d think Holmes would recognize that such a prejudice goes against his supposed nature of non-prejudice and pristine judgement, but oh well.

Following this sexism, we get some good old Victorian Unfortunate Implications from Mrs. Forrester: “An injured lady, half a million in treasure, a black cannibal, and a wooden-legged ruffian. They take the place of the conventional dragon or wicked earl.” To me, it’s odd she doesn’t refer to the non-cannibalistic others as, say, a white injured lady or a white wooden-legged ruffian. Why not “a ferocious cannibal” to fit in with the pattern of adjective-noun? Why must the cannibal be referred to as black before anything else?

You may wonder why this is disturbing to me. The fact is that too often in that age (and even in our own), blacks are thought of as uncivilized and naturally bad, so it seems she’s using that meaning here, and it’s as bad as Holmes saying that all women can’t be trusted. Both sentiments are rather disappointing (though I believe it’s intentional characterization in the case of the former) and the latter breaks an otherwise good pattern.

Let’s get to more pleasant bits of the chapter, like how Morstan doesn’t desire the treasure as much as Thaddeus Sholto. Noble again, a good match for the nobility of Watson. I already know they’re getting together at the end, but it’s good to see that it’s not simply dropping out of the sky without motivation for both parties.

The best parts of the chapter are Athelney Jones’ humblement and final release of innocent parties, and Holmes’ tendency to prank other people when he’s acting out a personage to cover a case unbeknownst. That Jones knows when to be humble probably tosses my unorthodox theory of blackmail aside, which I’m glad of, to tell the truth. Although there’s a strange bit of hypocrisy: Jones tells Watson that Holmes would have made a good officer, and he doesn’t care who knows it, but he certainly didn’t act that way at all a few chapters earlier. Hmph, I say, even if Holmes thinks well enough of Jones to invite him to dinner.

By the way, there’s a rather cute callback to Toby getting confused with the source of the creosote rather than the actual murderer, and with Holmes own confusion on the “scent”; it’s after their natures, but they right themselves in the end. All I can say is “Awwwww.”

ETA: And how could I miss this line from Holmes after he gets dinner all arranged for everybody: “Watson, you have never yet recognized my merits as a housekeeper.”

What. Hahahaha. That’s so awesome. And thus a thousand Holmes/Watson fics were born.

The Sign of Four: 8. The Baker Street Irregulars

Ah, the Irregulars again! I love ‘em. And they fit into the theme of this chapter, which is how Holmes deals with getting information from sources likely considered “below ground” by Scotland Yard.

I’m amused by how Holmes gets information out of the son of Mordecai Smith (the steam launch owner with a pretty cool name):

“Dear little chap!” said Holmes strategically. ((Snort.)) “What a rosy-cheeked young rascal! Now, Jack, is there anything you would like?”

The youth pondered for a moment.

“I’d like a shillin’,” said he.

“Nothing you would like better?”

“I’d like two shillin’ better,” the prodigy answered after some thought.

And so Holmes parts with his two shillings and gets even more information from Mrs. Smith by pretending that he’s looking for a steam boat and, basically, playing down his intelligence, just about playing dumb. “How could you possibly tell that it was the wooden-legged man who came in the night I don’t quite understand how you can be so sure.” Indeed. Or this:

“Ah! She’s not that old green launch with a yellow line, very broad in the beam?”

“No, indeed. She’s as trim a little thing as any on the river. She’s been fresh painted, black with two red streaks.”

Holmes handles other people “of that sort” by making sure they don’t know that their information is important, or else they’ll clam up. For a classist society as that, it’s too true—angering the wrong people may land you in the street, and in Victorian England that’s pretty close to a death sentence for someone without connections.

I don’t hold out much hope for poor Mr. Smith. It doesn’t sound like he’ll survive an encounter with the murderers, even if one of them is apparently not as murderous as the other, possibly by a long shot.

While Holmes shoots down Watson’s suggestions of following the trail of the Aurora themselves, he also says this about Athelney Jones:

He is not a bad fellow, and I should not like to do anything which would injure him professionally.

Say what? Arresting everybody in the house and throwing them into gaol, sneering at any path that’s not his own, doesn’t seem like something a good person would do. Holmes is either very kind, entirely possible in his early incarnations, or else he’s being blackmailed by Jones. Perhaps one of Jones’ “flashes of brilliance” led him to discover this information, whatever it was. I’m well aware this is more or less an Epileptic Trees theory, but it still amuses me. At least Jones’ antics will lead everyone to think that all the detectives on the case are on the absolute wrong trail—and the article in the paper the next day (“Mr. Jones’s well-known technical knowledge and his powers of minute observation” O RLY?) confirms it. Holmes and Watson are lucky they weren’t caught up in Jones’ arresting spree.

A side note: how can a wire be sent to Wiggins of the Baker Street Irregulars, who are all street urchins? I suppose there must be special arrangements set up, or perhaps they’re not all street urchins; I’d be interested in hearing about that particular story. The origins of the Baker Street Irregulars when Holmes was still in University, I like the sound of that.

Another note: Watson’s love is no longer creepy to me. “True, if I found [the treasure], it would probably put her forever beyond my reach. Yet it would be a petty and selfish love which would be influenced by such a thought as that.” He is a noble man, after all. Now I want to see him and Morstan get together. And possibly solve crimes.

A third note (I love how meaty this chapter is, it’s a damn sight better than just about everything from A Study in Scarlet): Holmes says, “I have a curious constitution. I never remember feeling tired by work, though idleness exhausts me completely.” It sounds like something someone could use to diagnose Holmes with… something. I don’t know what, though. Probably lots of things; psychology is not a hard science.

And now we arrive at the thing I was hoping would be delayed: the matter of Small’s companion, the Islander, who may well be the fourth in the sign of four. Watson wonders if it was a savage Indian. WHAT. JUST NO, WATSON, NO. “Hardly that,” says Holmes, which relieves me a bit, until he drags out the gazetteer volume that describes the people of the Andaman Islands. It says, among other things about cannibalism and ferociousness, “So intractable and fierce are they, that all the efforts of the British officials have failed to win them over in any degree.” Yes, people take so kindly to foreign powers attempting to colonize them. </sarcasm> It makes me wonder how much of that article is real, and how much imagined/prejudiced. That Holmes out and out believes what he reads make me really incredulous. JUST NO, HOLMES, NO.

It’s disappointing. “Justified” by the ignorance of 19th century England, yes, but incredibly disappointing to look at from the 21st century, especially since we are not yet beyond all that shit. However, because of the greatness of the rest of the material, and because we should look racism in the eye and say, “Yes, that was racist, and it did happen, let’s not let it happen again,” this chapter still rates a Must Read.

We end with some sweetness to wash out that bad taste as a concerned Holmes tells Watson to lie down and let him soothe him to sleep with the violin. Awwww.

The Sign of Four: 7. The Episode of the Barrel

Watson escorts Mary Morstan home, and places her on a pedastel in his mind, in a way which just right out puzzles me:

After the angelic fashion of women, she had borne trouble with a calm face as long as there was someone weaker than herself to support, and I had found her bright and placid by the side of the frightened housekeeper.

That doesn’t sound like a purely womanly characteristic, or even mostly womanly. Both men and women do this—being supportive of someone in need, in spite of one’s own fears and trauma, really comes quite naturally and may not necessarily be purely Samaratin in nature. Confusing at best, sexist at worst, but I suppose some like the romantic element.

Truly, I feel for Watson when he compares himself as a half-pay surgeon to Morstan’s possible level-up to Ultimate Heiress. He holds back because he doesn’t want to take advantage of her emotional state—which is a far nobler tact than most people would have were they in his place. Definitely no creepy stalking Edward Cullen antics here, and let’s hope it stays that way.

And as for Mrs. Cecil Forrester… well, it’s quite a warm scene when Morstan returns home:

She opened the door herself, a middle-aged, graceful woman, and it gave me joy to see how tenderly her arm stole round the other’s waist and how motherly was the voice in which she greeted her. She was clearly no mere paid dependant but an honoured friend.

Awww. The world surely needs Morstan and Forrester stories.

Now we get to the obtaining of Toby, the mongrel bloodhound, from Pinchin Lane. Mr. Sherman’s house is lovely beyond belief, and reminds me again of a Terry Pratchett character (Red Crescent, I think, from Feet of Clay, though Crescent speaks rather differently than Sherman):

“Step in, sir. Keep clear of the badger, for he bites. Ah, naughty, naughty; would you take a nip at the gentlemen?” This to a stoat which thrust its wicked head and red eyes between the bars of its cage. “Don’t mind that, sir; it’s only a slowworm. It hain’t got no fangs, so I gives it the run o’ the room, for it keeps the beetles down.”

I am amused and in love with the previous chapter and this one.

Meanwhile, Sergeant Colon has arrested everybody save for Holmes.

I’m not sure what the card hanging from Holmes’ neck is for, but watching him spryly climb up and around the roof is real entertainment, especially when he comes to a rather high point where the murdererous assistant leapt down, wonders if he’ll make it, and then goes down the rainpipe anyways.

Doyle doesn’t completely ignore Watson’s game leg or pretend it doesn’t exist, I notice. This is good and relatively realistic: the pain when the weather’s bad. This is weird: a six-mile trudge presents no problems, although it’s implied that it merely presents no problems at that time and he still limps. At another time, Watson might well have been incapacitated. But Watson wants adventure, is my impression, so he’ll ignore and not write about any pain.

Toby goes at it!

Toby follows the scent of the creosote one of the murderous team accidentally stepped in, Holmes gives an accounting of what must have happened with Jonathan Small, Arthur Morstan, Sholto Sr. There must have been someone else too, else why “the sign of the four”?

And then Toby leads them to a barrel of creosote, instead of continuing down the scent of the murderers, and Holmes and Watson have a good laugh.

This and the previous chapter are quintessential Holmes fiction. Lovely when it works. Let’s hope this keeps up, and I suspect it will, though there’s probably some misrepresentation trouble at the end, given how the titles of the chapters are laid out (“The Death of the Islander” is the one I’m eyeing).

The Sign of Four: 6. Sherlock Holmes Gives a Demonstration

The highlight of this chapter is most definitely Inspector Athelney Jones, but more on that later.

The other interesting aspect of this chapter is how much of the formula for almost all later stories is set down here, unlike in A Study in Scarlet:

  • Holmes’ intense method of investigation, often compared to the actions of a bloodhound hot on the scent: “so swift, silent, and furtive were his movements, like those of a trained bloodhound picking out a scent…”

  • Medical conclusions drawn by Watson (who, unlike Holmes, is not skilled with any other kind of deduction; not a bad character trait or a dumb one, just that compared to Holmes, Watson looks duller in comparison except where medicine is concerned). ((I believe these show up less often as the canon wears on, contributing to an impression of, years later, loss of interest on Watson’s part.))

  • Hilarious and/or frustrating interruption by the local bumbling police force, depending on how Doyle wants to play it. ((Jones falls firmly into the “and” category.))

  • The immortal line, “How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?”

  • Watson’s assurance that he wants to embark on adventure, no matter how much it touches his nerves: “I give you my word that this succession of strange surprises to-night has shaken my nerve completely. I should like, however, to see the matter through with you, now that I have got so far.” ((This is definitely mentioned less and less in later canon stories.))

  • Holmes’ assurance that he would love Watson’s assistance: “Your presence will be of great service to me.” ((Later on, when Holmes is in Jerk Mode, sometimes meant sarcastically.))

It’s by no means boring, but will become a comforting pattern when mysteries start to slide into the weird—somehow that makes me think of a more genteel Doctor Who. Sonic screwdrivers and patter, or investigating like a bloodhound and logical deduction; they’re grounding principles when the fictional world tilts. In this respect, it’s perhaps why the best stories in the Holmes canon often cover the weirdest spectacles, the difference between “Adventure of the Speckled Band” and “The Stock-broker’s Clerk”, if you will.

Now, getting back to Athelney Jones. Man, is he EVER so much worse than Lestrade or Gregson. He brings to mind Sergeant Colon from Terry Pratchett’s Discworld books more than anything else, and his demeanor and actions are just… wow.

“Oh, come, now, come! Never be ashamed to own up. But what is all this? Bad business! Bad business! ((The repeat is verbatim from the canon. Jones really is that… something.)) Stern facts here—no room for theories. How lucky that I happened to be out at Norwood over another case! I was at the station when the message arrived. What d’you think the man died of?”

Damn, man, do your own work, especially if you’re going to spend the rest of your presence in this chapter putting down Holmes’ methods.

My favorite Sergeant Colon Inspector Athelney Jones quotes:

  • “Ha! I have a theory. These flashes come upon me at times.”

  • “His appearance is—well, not attractive.”

  • “You see that I am weaving my web round Thaddeus.”

  • “The card is some hocus-pocus—a blind, as like as not.”

  • “Don’t promise too much, Mr. Theorist, don’t promise too much!”

At least Sergeant Colon didn’t sneer. Though apparently Jones does indeed have flashes of intelligence for reals, rarely, though I think perhaps Holmes gives him too much credit. Holmes says of him, “Il n’y a pas des sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l’esprit!“, or, “There are no fools so troublesome as those with some wit!” ((From Michael Shapiro’s Language Lore article, Discontinuous Lexica, which quotes from this particular chapter for examples.))

Oh, right, the plot. Getting to that. Holmes needs a dog and Morstan needs to go home since it’s been a long night, and so Watson is going to run both errands while Holmes interviews the servants and deals with Jones’… zeal. I’m pretty sure Holmes got the short end of that stick.

The Sign of Four: 2. The Statement of the Case

We now launch into the case quite a bit earlier than in A Study in Scarlet, which is quite welcome. We still combine this all with a little bit of characterization side-by-side, of a sort, namely Watson’s “experience of women which extends over many nations and three separate continents”, which is a little hmmmm. You just know that, whatever else, Holmes is going to tease the hell out of Watson when he reads The Sign of Four post-publication. In any case, Watson does have an eye for the ladies with his particularly detailed observations that would usually be employed with a crime scene, but never mind that for now.

Random note: Holmes has “clear-cut, hawk-like features.” I’ll leave the audience to figure out for themselves which actor fulfills this role the best. ((I vote for Brett, but that’s just me.))

The delivery of the case is matter-of-fact and yet intriguing, mostly due to the strangeness of the circumstances involved: Morstan’s father’s disappearance years ago, the strange gift of a large, high-quality pearl every year, the mysterious letter telling her to meet… someone… at a special time and place for justice of wrongs done to her. Whatever those are. Holmes pays particular attention to the paper, detail-orientated to an extreme extent as always, and amusingly reinterprets the letter’s advisement to “bring two friends” as meaning “two friends of each other, not necessarily friends of Miss Morstan.” He identifies Watson as friend explicitly here, which is again warming for someone so distanced from the rest of humanity.

I’ll note that Morstan has every indication of initiative and agency here, which is a relief from other works in this time period and even some in the present (Hollywood, I’m looking at you); still, we’ll see if this holds up later in the story.

After she leaves, here comes even more foreshadowing of romantic interest from Watson’s direction:

“What a very attractive woman!” I exclaimed, turning to my companion.

He had lit his pipe again and was leaning back with drooping eyelids. “Is she?” he said languidly; “I did not observe.”

“You really are an automaton–a calculating machine,” I cried. “There is something positively inhuman in you at times.”

He smiled gently.

“It is of the first importance,” he cried, “not to allow your judgment to be biased by personal qualities. A client is to me a mere unit, a factor in a problem. The emotional qualities are antagonistic to clear reasoning. I assure you that the most winning woman I ever knew was hanged for poisoning three little children for their insurance-money, and the most repellent man of my acquaintance is a philanthropist who has spent nearly a quarter of a million upon the London poor.”

I just have this feeling that Holmes is pulling Watson’s leg here, especially since he is indeed sensitive to the “winning” qualities of a woman, if criminally depraved. Incidentally, you could take Holmes’ disinterest in his client in a number of ways, including: staying with professional behavior (because, you know, his detecting is quite a serious business to him), asexuality or homosexuality, or pulling Watson’s leg. Take your pick; the gods know the fandom can quibble over this sort of detail more than enough.

Holmes does employ graphology, the study of handwriting, here; sadly, since then it’s been very much disproven in ways that Holmes would undoubtedly admire.

The chapter ends with… well… really quite heavy-handed foreshadowing of romantic interest, going on for paragraphs, ending with a reflection of his poor fortunes keeping him from seriously going after her, even though he’s likely experiencing infatuation right now. This is going to result in SO MUCH Holmes snark, you just know it, off-screen. (Or maybe even on-screen later on, I don’t remember exactly.) And in the interest of covering all sides of a debate, as well as amusement in talking about shipping wars in so old and outwardly staid a fandom as Sherlock Holmes, you could interpret all this as protesting too much, or an indication of skirt-chasing that will lead to future infidelity (perhaps one of his vices when he’s well, as briefly mentioned in Study), etc. etc. etc.

For my part, these days I wonder if Watson’s actually bisexual, with a lust for women and a more romantic love for men. It’s an interesting dynamic that would fall in line with his description of women versus men, and after all, sexuality is not so binary as all that. Or you could take it as him wisely refraining from indicating what was considered at the time an abnormal sexual preference.

I know some people don’t like the idea of discussing sexuality in the canon, even if it’s simply straight, but you gotta admit that Watson is not exactly helping that case here.

The Sign of Four: 1. The Science of Deduction

We open on a much more dynamic note than in A Study in Scarlet: on an actual scene, rather than a flashback. ((I’ll note that the BBC Radio 4 adaptation of Study made the wise choice of also opening on a scene, transformed from Watson’s flashback of the battlefield.)) What makes for a scene, a storytelling mechanism tied to “showing” as opposed to merely “telling”? That there are characters, a defined place, and it’s happening in the “present” of the story (not necessarily the same as present-tense). Often some form of action is ideal, rather than just dialogue, but even peppery dialogue can act as the “action” in a scene.

Here, the action is subtle, but nonetheless a compelling showing of someone injecting themselves with cocaine, laced with anticipation:

Sherlock Holmes took his bottle from the corner of the mantelpiece, and his hypodermic syringe from its neat morocco case. With his long,white, nervous fingers he adjusted the delicate needle and rolled back his left shirtcuff. For some little time his eyes rested thoughtfully upon the sinewy forearm and wrist, all dotted and scarred with innumerable puncture-marks. Finally, he thrust the sharp point home, pressed down the tiny piston, and sank back into the velvet-lined armchair with a long sigh of satisfaction.

Note that Watson’s eye for detail is very much present and adds a realness to the scene, painting a picture in our minds with words. Doyle definitely is quite a good writer, though his storytelling is sometimes a bit heavy-handed.

Getting on with the scene, we instantly have conflict, with Watson’s desire to get Holmes unhooked from the drug. Having hesitated for, as we learned, months now (in fact, many, implying double digits), he finally unleashes a speech about “a pathological and morbid process which involves increased tissue-change and may at last leave a permanent weakness.” As it turns out, he’s in fact right about this part. Holmes, with surprising short-sightedness, only worries about the “secondary action”, i.e. the acute deal, but Watson is more far-sighted. ((We’ll learn that this is usually the case with Holmes and Watson.)) Watson even talks about the crashing after the high, and as morbid as this may be, Holmes is almost certainly addicted—a psychological addiction, to be sure, but one that will nevertheless take up brain space. Sort of the point to Holmes, in fact. ((If you ever read some of the criticism that Nicholas Meyer’s pastiche, The Seven-Per-Cent Solution, has received, there’s the idea that psychological addiction could not possibly produce as severe effects as observed in the book. This is as myopic (and inaccurate) an idea as any that Holmes has about medical matters as applied to himself.))

And why does Holmes engage in this self-destructive act? For a similar reason that Watson found himself attracted to a most unusual roommate: to solve the problem of being bored, bored, bored. Holmes even launches into a rehash of his status as, at the time, the only consulting detective. Then, amusingly, he shifts the topic to A Study in Scarlet, which also exists verbatim in-universe. ((Which is one of the reasons it’s so tempting to play “The Game”, where events are viewed purely in-world and Doyle’s position is replaced entirely by Watson, for reals.)) And he doesn’t like the story, particularly the romance—i.e., five chapters spent in Utah. And Doyle (as Watson), responds indignantly to this criticism, which surely must have occurred in real life at the time as well: “I confess, too, that I was irritated by the egotism which seemed to demand that every line of my pamphlet should be devoted to his own special doings.” LOL.

It’s worth noting, particularly how this story ends, that Holmes is doing quite well for himself now, even earning accolades from France—his name truly is now, in some measure, famous. And yet, this is not enough to satisfy him; “I cannot live without brainwork. What else is there to live for?”

We get an interesting demonstration of his deductive powers, akin to what his real-life counterpart, Dr. Joseph Bell, also showed. This part isn’t boring either, although in the hands of a lesser writer it could have been. There is an interesting back-and-forth between Holmes and Watson, even including conflict when Watson believes, briefly, that Holmes has been spying on his familial affairs.

And then the lady of the story shows up, Mary Morstan, and Holmes wants Watson to stay. This is heart-warming coming from him when he’s in his more calculating moods.

A Study in Scarlet, Part 2: 7. The Conclusion

The final chapter in A Study in Scarlet doesn’t disappoint as an interesting read, despite being an information dump of how Holmes solved the case. You’d think this would simply be a dry litany, but instead we see how all the oddities that Watson observed over the course of the story come together into one whole:

  • Holmes’ attention to peculiar ground details around the murder scene.

  • Holmes’ study of poisons (in particular alkaloids).

  • Holmes’ eclectic study of past sensational murder cases, both in England and abroad in America (and likely elsewhere on the globe).

  • Holmes’ random knowledge of things like cigarette ashes, shoe sizes, and dirt.

  • Holmes’ Baker Street Irregulars and the tasks they were set upon.

  • And, let’s face it, Holmes’ non-squeamishness around corpses.

It’s cathartic and even pleasing to see everything come together in Holmes’ mind and odd habits.

Jefferson Hope dies a Disney Death of sorts (i.e., nobody has a hand in his death but nature), which is the best ending he could have gotten.

And Holmes’ assistance in the case is entirely ignored by the papers, to his indignant amusement. But Watson promises that he’s going to patch that up, and until then—

Populus me sibilat, at mihi plaudo
Ipse domi simul ac nummos contemplar in arca.

This is part of a poem from Horace, Book 1, Satire 1, and can be roughly translated as:

The public hisses at me, but I applaud myself
in my own own house and contemplate the riches in my chest.

And considering Holmes’ arrogance, it’s entirely appropriate that his vanity about his gifts (deserved as they may be) is represented by a quote from a Roman miser.

Next time: we’re going to take a break from reading, and instead evaluate the pros and cons of BBC Radio 4′s adaptation of Study. I suspect there will be vast improvements in the storytelling—there almost always are where this particular radio adaptation is concerned.

A Study in Scarlet, Part 2: 6. A Continuation of the Reminiscences of John Watson, M.D.

This and the next chapter are closely linked together: two sides of the same coin, the murderer’s story and Holmes’ retelling of how he put the pieces together. We’ll see if Doyle can keep things as interesting in both parts; for the nonce, Jefferson Hope’s tale of how he came to find and murder Drebber and Stangerson is quite interesting all on its own.

I’ll note that there is a parallel between Holmes’ relentless pursuit (once encouraged by Watson) and Hope’s, with Hope even expressing admiration:

“If there’s a vacant place for a chief of the police, I reckon you are the man for it,” he said, gazing with undisguised admiration at my fellow-lodger. “The way you kept on my trail was a caution.”

It’s no mistake that phrases that would come to describe Holmes later (and our drinking game), “iron constitution” and “bloodhound”, were also used to describe Hope. Hope and Holmes are on just about equal footing, though Holmes wins the match ((Something that also comes up in the final confrontation between the cabbie and Holmes in BBC’s Sherlock.)). Which brings up an interesting point that Neil Gaiman played with in “A Study in Emerald”: (spoilers) what if Holmes was the murderer? Gaiman’s set-up is quite delightful and reflective of the original source material.

Doyle packs a punch in Hope’s story here, improving visibly even upon the previous chapters, and it’s the most riveting retelling in Study yet. Admittedly, the impact would have been less were it not for the depth of Hope’s backstory, as problematic as some of them were: the desperation of the victims escaping once more and what it means, the importance of vengeance, the satisfaction of taking that vengeance at long last and in such a manner that begs Providence for heavenly justice on earth.

There’s one unanswered question at the end: who played the part of the haggard old woman who retrieved Lucy Ferrier’s wedding ring? Hope’s not speaking, so hopefully Holmes will reveal the culprit in the next chapter, or at least a description of said man.

A Study in Scarlet, Part 1: 7. Light in the Darkness

The title sounds like it hails from something like Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings rather than a Sherlock Holmes story, but writers who step into drama seem to suddenly become inspired. So it is here, where the climax of the first part occurs—which is a good thing, since I was wondering when it would show up, but it’s just in time.

The atmosphere is tense, as Lestrade, who’s just dropped in to deliver the shattering news to Gregson’s case, is dumbfounded and not afraid to admit it.

“I freely confess that I was of the opinion that Stangerson was concerned in the death of Drebber. This fresh development has shown me that I was completely mistaken. Full of the one idea, I set myself to find out what had become of the secretary….”

He also comments that he’s dropped in on a council of war, and that’s exactly what it turns out to be.

The murder of the main suspect is both similar and unsimilar to the first, except this time the man has been killed in his own rented room, but with the word RACHE again written in blood on the wall, and with a very clear, very bloody stab through the side and into the heart.

Watson, as this is gradually revealed, feels that his “nerves, which were steady enough on the field of battle, tingled as [he] thought of it.” Oh Watson, you’re so jonesing for adventure.

Holmes remains poker-faced throughout Lestrade’s story (the story-within-a-story that Doyle is getting better at, and will become a vital mechanic through the rest of the series), a far cry from the man dancing with joy at a scientific discovery. Events seem to have doured even him.

And then, this happens:

“And there was nothing else?” Holmes asked.

“Nothing of any importance. The man’s novel, with which he had read himself to sleep, was lying upon the bed, and his pipe was on a chair beside him. There was a glass of water on the table, and on the window-sill a small chip ointment box containing a couple of pills.”

Sherlock Holmes sprang from his chair with an exclamation of delight.

“The last link,” he cried, exultantly. “My case is complete.”

This is one of the things I love about Sherlock Holmes: he’s almost childlike in his enjoyment at discovery, even if it happens within some of the most joyless subject matters. And, of course, his brilliance.

And now we come to the dog-poisoning.

This tends to be skipped over when people remember fondly A Study in Scarlet, and Watson makes very sure that we know that the dog was old, sick, and needed to be put out of its misery before Holmes poisons it with the evidence that Lestrade has so carelessly put into his pocket, but plastic baggies weren’t around back then:

I went downstairs and carried the dog upstairs in my arms. Its laboured breathing and glazing eye showed that it was not far from its end. Indeed, its snow-white muzzle proclaimed that it had already exceeded the usual term of canine existence. I placed it upon a cushion on the rug.

Unfortunately, the dog is a long time dying, and seems fine for minutes on end. This provokes another outburst from Holmes, this time far less joyful.

Holmes had taken out his watch, and as minute followed minute without result, an expression of the utmost chagrin and disappointment appeared upon his features. He gnawed his lip, drummed his fingers upon the table, and showed every other symptom of acute impatience. So great was his emotion that I felt sincerely sorry for him, while the two detectives smiled derisively, by no means displeased at this check which he had met.

He’s now moved, impassioned, by the case; whereas before, Watson actually had to drag him along to Lariston Gardens in the first place. Also, nobody except Watson is actually being mature in this room.

And then Holmes tries the other pill, which is when we come to the deviousness of the case ((And which actually has been copied over in BBC’s Sherlock, “A Study in Pink”.)): the dog dies (not all that well, it has to be said). And it’s all because the murderer presented his victims with the most nerve-wracking of choices: choose between two pills, “one was of the most deadly poison, and the other was entirely harmless.”

Holmes further comments, “I ought to have known that before ever I saw the box at all.” And can’t you just love that: what he views as a failure on his part is beyond the reasoning of those around him and probably most readers, but he’s a quick study. Sherlock Holmes isn’t perfect, but he’s pretty damn good.

It’s the cabbie what done it. ((There are additional echoes in Sherlock: “for we have a shrewd and desperate man to deal with, who is supported, as I have had occasion to prove, by another who is as clever as himself.”)) It’s brilliantly done, with the right amount of storytelling vigor as the man is captured and Holmes proclaims the murderer’s identity, and the murderer attempts to escape by jumping through the window—with cuffed hands I might add. Cue satisfying fight scene.

And then we end the chapter with what seems to be the perfect lead-in to the next: “…we have reached the end of our little mystery. You are very welcome to put any questions that you like to me now, and there is no danger that I will refuse to answer them,” says Holmes.

But the next chapter is a non-sequitar into the next story-within-a-story, and that one goes on for several chapters. If this was a serial, no one would get answers for weeks on end.

Oh Doyle. Pacing, what did you do to it? Even when read straight, the sudden break is jarring and not at all satisfactory. ((This is where Sherlock‘s “A Study in Pink” wins over the original: the ending is tighter, the murderer more frightening to a modern day tale, without having to resort to stereotypes… much.))